![]() As I pointed out in the first article in my ongoing series on Gnosticism, these background narratives often find expression in inchoate practices, assumptions and conventions which implicitly ‘carry’ philosophical ideas even while those ideas may not be explicitly affirmed or self-consciously acknowledged. ![]() Often the most powerful ideas are those which exist, not as disengaged concepts in a person’s head, nor even as ideas that can be reduced to a set of propositions on paper, but as unstated understandings that create the ‘background’ for how we perceive the world and navigate social space. Consequently, they may unwittingly hold beliefs that are mutually contradictory.”Ī person’s life, motivations, priorities, agendas, conversation and assumptions are just some of the areas affected by our philosophy of the world, whether that philosophy is thought-out or merely implicit and unconscious. They may not even realize that they have a worldview. As John Byl puts it in his book The Divine Challenge, “Many people hold their worldviews implicitly, without having deeply reflected on what they believe and why they believe it. This is even true for those who have never given much thought to questions of worldview. One’s philosophy of the world, or worldview, is still the backbone for how we view everything else, whether we realize it or not. We have come a long way from the time when philosophy was considered to be the backbone of all the disciplines, including the sciences (indeed, the early scientists called themselves “Natural Philosophers”). Reflection on ideas has little or no relevance to the world of everyday affairs, many people think. ![]() Such a statement may seem out of place in a society that has long since relegated philosophy (the science of correct thinking) to a specialist discipline. In fact, we could state the matter in even stronger terms: there has never been a more powerful influence, a greater agency of change or a stronger force for good or ill in this world than that of human ideas. The more one studies history, the more apparent it becomes that William Temple’s father had a point. It is reported that William Temple, who became the Archbishop of Canterbury in 1942, once asked his father, who was then the Archbishop, “Daddy, why don’t the philosophers rule the world?” His father looked down at the boy and replied, “Of course they do, silly-two hundred years after they’re dead!” For a complete directory of all my Colson Center articles, click here. This article was originally published in my column at the Colson Center.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |